GoFundMe lawsuit: Oregon nonprofits say AI-made pages used their names

Six nonprofit organisations in the US state of Oregon, including the Oregon Shakespeare Festival, pressed their lawsuit against the online fundraising platform GoFundMe at a federal court hearing in Eugene this week, in the last week of October 2026. They allege that GoFundMe used artificial intelligence (AI) to create fundraising pages carrying their names and logos without their permission, and that donors could be misled into thinking the charities had set the pages up. GoFundMe denies wrongdoing and has asked the court to dismiss the case; Judge Amy Potter is weighing that request.

The case is one of the clearest examples so far of a question many companies now face: what happens when AI is used to create content about real organisations without asking them? GoFundMe says it built pages for nonprofits from public information to make giving easier. The nonprofits say that using their names and logos, and then requiring them to accept the platform's terms to reach the money, amounts to taking control of their identity. Their lawyer, Mikal Watts, has described it as a "partial usurpation" that is still illegal even if no money changed hands.

The legal arguments touch on trademark and consumer law. A trademark is a name or logo that identifies an organisation, and using it in a way that could make people think the owner approved something can be unlawful. "Fair use" is a legal defence that allows limited use of others' material in some circumstances, such as commentary or truthful description. GoFundMe relies on that defence and on its claim that the pages were truthful. The court's decision on whether the case can go ahead will indicate how far platforms can go in generating pages about real organisations using AI.

For charities, the issue is about trust and control. Donors who give through a page carrying a charity's logo expect the charity to stand behind it. If platforms can create such pages automatically, charities may have to watch the internet for pages in their name and deal with platforms' terms to reach donations.

There is a lesson for India too. Indian crowdfunding platforms and charities work online in the same way, and similar questions could arise under Indian trademark law if a platform generated pages or profiles about organisations without their consent. Charities and donors anywhere should check that a fundraising page was set up or approved by the organisation it names.

Short-term: The judge's ruling on the motion to dismiss will decide whether the case proceeds to fuller hearings. GoFundMe's switch to opt-in pages already changes how its nonprofit pages work.

Long-term: If the case goes ahead and the nonprofits win, platforms may need explicit consent before using AI to build pages about real organisations. A dismissal would give platforms more room.

Who is affected: Charities and nonprofits whose names appear on platforms; donors; GoFundMe and other fundraising and AI-driven platforms.

Questions and Answers