CBI arrests SFIO deputy director in Rs 1 crore bribe case tied to DHFL probe
Representative image: succo / Pixabay
The CBI said on October 15, 2026 it arrested an SFIO Chennai deputy director and two others after an alleged Rs 20 lakh payment against a Rs 1 crore demand.
What Happened
The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) said on Thursday, October 15, 2026, that it has arrested a Deputy Director of the Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO) in Chennai and two other people in a bribery case linked to the SFIO's own probe into the DHFL loan fraud. According to the CBI, the accused demanded Rs 1 crore from a person under investigation in exchange for favourable treatment, and were arrested after a Delhi-based advocate allegedly accepted Rs 20 lakh as part payment on the officer's behalf. The agency named the officer as Harish Kumar Tanwar, a 2017-batch Indian Revenue Service (Income Tax) officer, and the other two accused as advocate Bharat Sharma and his relative Aryan Sharma. The allegations are yet to be tested in court.
Key Facts
- The SFIO is the Union government's specialist agency for complex corporate fraud, working under the Ministry of Corporate Affairs.
- The CBI registered a case after a complaint that the officer, the advocate and others had sought Rs 1 crore to help the complainant in an ongoing SFIO investigation.
- The CBI says it verified the complaint and laid a trap; the arrests followed the alleged handover of Rs 20 lakh as the first instalment.
- Searches were carried out at premises linked to the officer and the advocate, and the CBI said it recovered material connected to the case.
- The underlying SFIO probe concerns Dewan Housing Finance Corporation Ltd (DHFL), whose former promoters are accused of defrauding a consortium of 17 banks led by Union Bank of India of about Rs 34,615 crore.
- Some reports gave a different batch year for the officer; the CBI's account, as reported, describes him as a 2017-batch IRS officer.
Why It Matters
The case is unusual because it turns the spotlight on an agency whose job is to catch fraud. The SFIO handles the most complicated corporate cases in India, often involving thousands of crore in public money. Companies and individuals it investigates can face prosecution under the Companies Act, so its officers hold real power over outcomes. An allegation that an investigating officer tried to sell favourable treatment strikes at the credibility of that process.
The DHFL case is one of the largest banking frauds in the country's history. The money involved came largely from public sector banks, which means ordinary depositors and taxpayers ultimately carry the loss. Any attempt to interfere with the investigation, if proved, could raise questions about evidence already gathered and slow down a case that has taken years to build.
The arrests also show the system catching its own. The CBI acted on a complaint from the person who was allegedly asked to pay, verified it and used a trap, the standard method under the Prevention of Corruption Act. That a complainant came forward suggests that those under investigation are willing to report demands rather than pay them, which is the outcome anti-corruption laws are designed to encourage.
| Point | Detail |
|---|---|
| Agency of accused officer | Serious Fraud Investigation Office, Chennai |
| Alleged demand | Rs 1 crore |
| Amount allegedly handed over | Rs 20 lakh |
| Underlying case | DHFL bank loan fraud, about Rs 34,615 crore |
Impact
Short-term: The three accused are expected to be produced before a court, and the CBI will seek custody to question them. The SFIO and the Ministry of Corporate Affairs are likely to review the officer's work on the DHFL file and may take departmental action, which usually includes suspension of an arrested officer.
Long-term: The case may prompt tighter internal checks at the SFIO, such as closer supervision of contact between investigators, lawyers and people under investigation. Defence lawyers in the DHFL prosecution may also try to use the allegations to challenge parts of the SFIO's findings, which could add delay.
Who is affected: Banks and depositors waiting for recovery in the DHFL case, companies under SFIO investigation, honest officers at the agency whose work now faces extra scrutiny, and the legal profession, given that an advocate is among the accused.
Key Takeaway
The CBI has arrested an SFIO Deputy Director and two others over an alleged Rs 1 crore bribe demand tied to the DHFL fraud probe, putting the integrity of India's top corporate fraud investigator under scrutiny.
Questions and Answers
What is the Serious Fraud Investigation Office?
The Serious Fraud Investigation Office is a Union government agency under the Ministry of Corporate Affairs that investigates complex corporate frauds and can recommend prosecution under the Companies Act.
Who did the CBI arrest in the SFIO bribery case?
The CBI named SFIO Deputy Director Harish Kumar Tanwar of the Chennai office, advocate Bharat Sharma and Bharat Sharma's relative Aryan Sharma. All three are accused, not convicted.
How much bribe was allegedly demanded?
According to the CBI, the accused sought Rs 1 crore from the complainant, and the arrests came after Rs 20 lakh was allegedly accepted as part payment.
What is the DHFL case?
It is a bank fraud case in which the former promoters of Dewan Housing Finance Corporation are accused of cheating a 17-bank consortium led by Union Bank of India of about Rs 34,615 crore.
Disclaimer: Prepared by the Peepals newsroom from publicly available sources with AI assistance. Information is accurate to the best of our knowledge at the time of publication and may change. Images may be representative. Not professional advice. Report an error via our contact page.
Sourced and fact-checked by the Peepals Global Editorial Team
Nestle share price falls 7% despite 36% profit jump as company flags food inflation
Manoj Bajpayee's Gajab Raat trailer out; renamed Netflix film premieres October 23
Reported, fact-checked and published by the Peepals Global Editorial Team.
