Foreign divorce, new citizenship won't shield husband from bigamy case: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court of India ruled on Tuesday, 3 November 2026 that a divorce granted by a foreign court on a ground that Indian law does not recognise, and a later change of citizenship, cannot protect a husband from prosecution for bigamy in India. The case came from Andhra Pradesh. After failing to get a divorce in India, the husband obtained a divorce decree from a court in the United Kingdom in 2014 on the ground of "irretrievable breakdown" of the marriage, and then married another woman in the UK. The court refused to quash the bigamy case against him, so it can proceed to trial, but it dropped the proceedings against his parents and his second wife.

Marriages that cross borders are common in Indian families, with one spouse often moving abroad for work. When such marriages break down, a spouse living overseas may find it quicker to get a divorce from a foreign court, sometimes on grounds that Indian law does not accept. This ruling makes clear that such a decree does not automatically end a Hindu marriage in the eyes of Indian law, and that remarrying on the strength of it can expose a person to a bigamy case in India.

For women left behind in India, often wives of men who have moved abroad, the judgment is a significant protection. It means a husband cannot end the marriage simply by going to a foreign court on a ground the wife could not have been divorced on at home, and then taking a new citizenship. Under the court's reading of the rules on foreign judgments, the ground used abroad must be one recognised by the law under which the couple married.

The court also drew a line between the husband and his relatives, quashing the case against his parents and second wife while letting the case against him go on.

The judgment does not stop couples from divorcing abroad. It means that, for a Hindu marriage, a foreign divorce will be recognised in India only if it meets Indian legal standards, such as being granted on a ground available under the Hindu Marriage Act.

Peepals timeline: The husband sought a divorce in India and did not get one. He then obtained a UK decree in 2014 on the ground of irretrievable breakdown and remarried in the UK. A bigamy case followed in Andhra Pradesh, and he and his family sought to have it quashed. On 3 November 2026, the Supreme Court refused to quash the case against him, relying on its 1991 Venkata Lakshmi precedent, while ending the proceedings against his parents and second wife.

Short-term: The bigamy case against the husband returns to the trial court in Andhra Pradesh, where the evidence will be tested.

Long-term: The ruling guides courts and families in the many disputes involving non-resident Indians, and gives spouses in India a clear basis to challenge foreign divorces granted on grounds not recognised at home.

Who is affected: spouses in cross-border Hindu marriages, especially wives living in India whose husbands are abroad, families of non-resident Indians, family lawyers and trial courts.

Questions and Answers