Tech Start-ups & Stories

GM to pay $220 million to US states over sale of drivers' data

By Karan BansalTech Startups Correspondent, Peepals Tech
WhatsAppX
Representative image: car dashboard touchscreen

Representative image: Melonemond / Pixabay

GM agreed on October 29, 2026 to pay $220 million to US states over claims it sold drivers' data to brokers and insurers, and to adopt strict consent rules.

What Happened

General Motors (GM), the US carmaker, has agreed to pay $220 million to settle claims by a coalition of US states that it sold drivers' driving and location data to data brokers, who passed it on to insurance companies, the states announced on Thursday, October 29, 2026. The coalition, co-led by Oregon and Washington, includes about three dozen states; one tally puts it at 35 states plus the District of Columbia. GM did not admit wrongdoing. Under the settlement, the company must get drivers' clear, affirmative consent before collecting or sharing their driving data, and must submit to outside checks of its privacy programme.

Key Facts

  • Amount: $220 million, to be shared among the participating states; Oregon will receive more than $10.4 million and Washington $12.3 million, according to those states.
  • The claims centre on GM's Smart Driver programme, which collected driving and location data through its OnStar connected-car service.
  • Regulators said most customers were signed up for Smart Driver at dealerships through a combined OnStar sign-up process.
  • Regulators also said the OnStar app wrongly told more than 370,000 drivers that they were not enrolled while their data continued to be collected and sold.
  • GM must obtain affirmative express consent before collecting or sharing driver data, limit what it collects, and undergo internal and third-party privacy assessments.
  • GM says it ended Smart Driver in 2024. Texas, which sued GM separately in 2024, is not part of the settlement.

Why It Matters

Modern cars are computers on wheels. Many are permanently connected to the internet so that they can offer navigation, emergency calls, remote locking and app controls. That connection also lets carmakers record where a car goes, how fast it travels and how hard it brakes. This data is valuable: insurers can use it to judge how risky a driver is, and that can raise or lower premiums. The case against GM was that drivers did not knowingly agree to have this information sold, and some were told they were not enrolled when they were.

The settlement matters well beyond one company. It sets out, in practical terms, what regulators expect from any business that collects data from devices people use every day: ask clearly, collect only what is needed, and let independent auditors check. Terms like "affirmative express consent" mean the customer must actively say yes, rather than having agreement buried in a long sign-up form. For technology start-ups building connected products, from car software to fitness trackers and smart-home devices, the case is a warning that data-sharing deals can bring large penalties years later.

There is a clear lesson for India too. India's Digital Personal Data Protection (DPDP) Act, 2023, and its rules, notified on November 13, 2025, are coming into force in stages. A rule on consent managers, regulated platforms through which people can give, track and withdraw consent, is due to take effect on November 13, 2026. As more cars sold in India come with built-in connectivity, Indian carmakers, insurers and start-ups using vehicle data will face the same basic question the GM case raises: did the driver really agree?

ItemDetail
Settlement amount$220 million
AnnouncedOctober 29, 2026
Programme at issueSmart Driver, via OnStar
Drivers wrongly told they were not enrolledMore than 370,000
Key conditionAffirmative express consent before sharing data
Admission of wrongdoingNone

Impact

Short-term: GM pays $220 million and must change how it handles driver data, while the participating states receive funds and gain oversight through third-party assessments.

Long-term: The terms are likely to shape how carmakers and other connected-device companies design consent and data-sharing, and they give regulators elsewhere, including in India, a model for what clear consent should look like.

Who is affected: GM owners in the participating US states, car insurers and data brokers that bought driving data, connected-car and device start-ups, and privacy regulators in the US and other countries.

Key Takeaway

GM agreed on October 29, 2026, to pay $220 million and adopt strict consent rules to settle state claims that it sold drivers' data to brokers and insurers, without admitting wrongdoing.

Questions and Answers

Why did General Motors agree to pay $220 million?

To settle claims by a coalition of US states that it sold drivers' driving and location data, collected through its Smart Driver programme and OnStar service, to data brokers who passed it to insurers. GM did not admit wrongdoing.

What must GM change under the settlement?

It must get drivers' affirmative express consent before collecting or sharing driving data, limit what it collects, and undergo internal and independent third-party privacy assessments.

What was the Smart Driver programme?

It was a GM feature that collected driving and location data through the OnStar connected-car service. GM says it discontinued the programme in 2024.

Does this affect drivers in India?

The settlement covers GM customers in the participating US states. For India, it is a relevant example as the Digital Personal Data Protection Act's rules come into force in stages, including a consent-manager rule due on November 13, 2026.

Disclaimer: Prepared by the Peepals newsroom from publicly available sources with AI assistance. Information is accurate to the best of our knowledge at the time of publication and may change. Images may be representative. Not professional advice. Report an error via our contact page.

By Karan Bansal, Tech Startups CorrespondentCovers Tech Start-ups & Stories and more for Peepals Tech. All stories by Karan Bansal

Get the day's stories in your inbox

Peepals Weekly: the week decoded, free. One email a week, unsubscribe in one click.

Karan Bansal is a pen name of the Peepals Global Editorial Team, which researches, fact-checks and publishes every story. The portrait is an illustration.

More from Peepals Tech

The week's top stories, in your inbox. Free.

The most important, fact-checked stories from all seven publications, once a week.