Kerala PSC chairman skips questioning; Crime Branch summons him for November 10

Representative image: fulopszokemariann / Pixabay
Kerala PSC chairman M.R. Baiju declined Crime Branch questioning pending a High Court plea; the SIT has summoned him again for 10 November 2026.
What Happened
The Crime Branch's Special Investigation Team (SIT) has issued a fresh notice to Kerala Public Service Commission (PSC) chairman M.R. Baiju, asking him to appear for questioning on Tuesday, 10 November 2026, after he declined to attend a second round of questioning in the State Planning Board examination irregularities case. Baiju told investigators in writing that he could not appear until the Kerala High Court decides the PSC's petition seeking to quash the investigation. The SIT has said the High Court has neither stayed the probe nor barred it from questioning him, and reports say investigators may inform the court if he does not comply.
Key Facts
- Baiju declined a Crime Branch notice for a second round of questioning, citing the PSC's pending petition in the High Court, as reported on 6 November 2026.
- The SIT then issued a new notice on 7 November asking him to appear on Tuesday, 10 November.
- The SIT's position is that the High Court has not stayed the investigation or restrained it from questioning the chairman.
- The PSC's petition seeks to quash the prosecution sanction and the FIR in the Planning Board case; the FIR cites criminal breach of trust and charges of bribery and misconduct.
- Investigators suspect that unilateral decisions by the chairman may have contributed to the irregularities. Statements by PSC members reportedly said he chose the panel that set the questions and the officials who evaluated the answer scripts. Baiju has not accepted this, and none of the allegations has been proved.
- Former PSC deputy secretary P. Satheesh, who was in charge of the examination wing, was arrested from his home in Kozhikode on 28 October in the same case.
Why It Matters
The Kerala PSC conducts recruitment examinations for state government jobs, and its credibility rests on the belief that question papers are set and marked fairly. The Planning Board case concerns a recruitment examination in which questions were allegedly left out of evaluation, which can change who makes the rank list. When the head of the commission is under investigation, candidates who are waiting for other results and appointments are watching closely.
The present standoff is about process. The chairman's position is that he will cooperate once the High Court has ruled on the PSC's plea. The SIT's position is that, without a stay, a person who receives a notice is expected to appear. How that dispute is settled, either by Baiju appearing on 10 November or by the court taking up the issue, will decide how fast the probe moves. The High Court had earlier questioned why PSC members were not cooperating with the investigation and had criticised its slow pace.
The case has also become a constitutional and political question. The Governor has recommended invoking Article 317 of the Constitution, which sets out how members of a state public service commission can be removed, against the chairman and 15 members. A BJP delegation has met President Droupadi Murmu seeking their removal. Separately, the Crime Branch has booked the chairman and members in a different case over the Fisheries Extension Officer examination.
Peepals timeline: On 5 October, the High Court questioned why PSC members were not cooperating with the Planning Board probe. On 28 October, the Crime Branch arrested former deputy secretary P. Satheesh. By 31 October, a separate case had been registered against the chairman and members over the Fisheries Extension Officer examination. On 6 November, it was reported that the chairman had declined a second round of questioning. On 7 November, the SIT issued a fresh notice for 10 November.
Impact
Short-term: The next step is whether the chairman appears before the SIT on 10 November. If he does not, the investigators may approach the High Court, which is already hearing the PSC's petition.
Long-term: The outcome of the High Court case and of the Article 317 process will decide whether the commission's present leadership stays in office. Any finding that evaluation was manipulated could also affect the rank lists from the examinations under investigation.
Who is affected: Candidates who took the State Planning Board and Fisheries Extension Officer examinations; job-seekers waiting for other Kerala PSC results and appointments; PSC members and staff under investigation; and the state government.
What to watch next: Whether M.R. Baiju appears before the Crime Branch on Tuesday, 10 November 2026, and the High Court's decision on the PSC's petition to quash the investigation.
Key Takeaway
After the Kerala PSC chairman declined a second round of questioning pending a High Court ruling, the Crime Branch has summoned him again for 10 November, saying the court has not stayed its probe.
Questions and Answers
Why did the Kerala PSC chairman not appear before the Crime Branch?
M.R. Baiju told investigators in writing that he could not appear until the Kerala High Court decides the PSC's petition seeking to quash the investigation into the State Planning Board examination case.
When has the Kerala PSC chairman been asked to appear next?
The Crime Branch's Special Investigation Team issued a fresh notice on 7 November 2026 asking him to appear on Tuesday, 10 November 2026.
Has the High Court stopped the Kerala PSC exam fraud probe?
No stay has been reported. The SIT says the High Court has neither stayed the investigation nor barred it from questioning the chairman. The court is still hearing the PSC's petition.
What is the Kerala PSC Planning Board exam case about?
It concerns alleged irregularities in a PSC recruitment examination for the State Planning Board, including questions that were allegedly not evaluated. A former deputy secretary was arrested on 28 October, and investigators are examining the chairman's role. The allegations have not been proved.
Disclaimer: Prepared by the Peepals newsroom from publicly available sources with AI assistance. Information is accurate to the best of our knowledge at the time of publication and may change. Images may be representative. Not professional advice. Report an error via our contact page.
By Meera Iyer, Governance & Policy EditorCovers Governance & Policy and more for Peepals Bharat. All stories by Meera Iyer
Get the day's stories in your inbox
Peepals Weekly: the week decoded, free. One email a week, unsubscribe in one click.
Meera Iyer is a pen name of the Peepals Global Editorial Team, which researches, fact-checks and publishes every story. The portrait is an illustration.









