Himachal HC halts sacking of scientist removed days after seeking maternity benefits

The Himachal Pradesh High Court on Monday, 12 October 2026, stayed the termination of Dr Aaina Sharma, a scientist who says she was dismissed three days after applying for maternity benefits, and ordered that she be allowed to continue in her job. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua passed the interim order on a writ petition Dr Sharma filed against the Union of India and others, directing the respondents to let her keep working as Scientist-B (Medical) under her original appointment letter of 24 July 2024. The court issued notices to the Union Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), AIIMS Bilaspur and others, and listed the case for 18 November 2026.

For many working women in India, the fear that announcing a pregnancy or asking for maternity leave could cost them their job is a real one, especially for those on contracts rather than in permanent posts. Dr Sharma's case puts that fear in front of a court. The sequence she describes, a request for maternity benefits followed three days later by termination, is the kind of timing courts look at closely when deciding whether an employer's stated reason is genuine.

The employer's side matters too. The respondents say her post was affected by a restructuring of staff under a government scheme for the new Finance Commission period. If that restructuring applied to many posts and was decided before her application, it may be a legitimate reason. If not, the case could become an example of how contractual workers can be removed when they need leave. The court has not yet ruled on which account is correct; it has only ensured that she keeps her job while it decides.

The case also highlights the position of contract staff in public research and health programmes. Dr Sharma herself was on a contract that she says had been extended. Fixed-term contracts give institutions flexibility, but it can leave employees with less protection when they need maternity or medical leave. How courts treat such cases shapes how secure women in these roles can feel about starting a family.

Short-term: Dr Sharma can return to work while the case continues, and the respondents must file their replies before the next hearing.

Long-term: The final ruling could clarify how far a restructuring of contract posts can affect an employee who has applied for maternity benefits, a question relevant to many women on contracts in public institutions.

Who is affected: Dr Sharma; women employed on contracts in government health and research schemes; the institutions named in the case; and employers deciding on staffing changes.

Questions and Answers