Online friends and teen mental health: who teens chat with matters, study finds

Representative image: MabelAmber / Pixabay
A Stockholm University study of 3,034 15-year-olds, published 4 November 2026, links online chats with close friends to better well-being and online-only friends to poorer.
What Happened
Who teenagers talk to online may matter as much as how much they talk, according to a study from Stockholm University published on Wednesday, 4 November 2026, in the journal Child and Adolescent Mental Health. Researchers looked at 3,034 Swedish 15-year-olds and found that frequent online contact with close friends and larger friend groups went along with better mental well-being, while regular contact with friends known only online went along with poorer well-being, especially for girls and for teens who saw their families as less well-off.
Key Facts
- The study was carried out by researchers at Stockholm University's Department of Public Health Sciences; the corresponding author is Viviane Straatmann.
- It used answers from 3,034 15-year-olds who took part in Sweden's Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) surveys in 2017/2018 and 2021/2022.
- Intense online communication with close friends and with larger friend groups was linked to better mental well-being.
- Moderate or intense communication with online-only friends, people met and known only on the internet, was linked to poorer well-being.
- The negative link with online-only friends was strongest among girls and among adolescents who perceived their families as less wealthy.
- The paper describes its data as nationally representative and pooled cross-sectional, so it shows associations, not cause and effect.
Why It Matters
Most public debate about young people and screens asks one question: how many hours are they online? This study suggests that question is incomplete. Teenagers use the same apps to chat with school friends, to keep up with a wider group, and to talk to strangers they have never met. The Stockholm team found that these three kinds of contact did not go with the same outcomes. Staying closely in touch online with friends they also know in real life was associated with feeling better, while frequent contact with friends known only online was associated with feeling worse.
The authors' message, as described by the corresponding author, is that it is not only the amount of online communication that matters but also who adolescents are communicating with. For young readers, that is a practical way to think about their own habits: an evening of messages with close friends is not the same as hours of chatting with people they have never met.
The finding about girls and about teens from less well-off families is important because these groups may be more exposed to the risks of online-only relationships. The study measured family wealth by how the teenagers themselves saw it, not by actual income, which is one of its limits.
There are other limits too. The data come from surveys taken at single points in time, so the study cannot say whether online-only friendships make teens feel worse or whether teens who already feel low seek out online-only friends. The authors also note that the results come from one country and one age group, which limits how far they can be applied elsewhere, including to young people in India.
Peepals timeline: The data were collected in Sweden's HBSC survey rounds of 2017/2018 and 2021/2022, four years apart. The researchers pooled both rounds, analysed 3,034 responses from 15-year-olds, and published the results on 4 November 2026.
| Type of online contact | Link with well-being in the study |
|---|---|
| Close friends, intense contact | Better well-being |
| Larger friend groups, intense contact | Better well-being |
| Online-only friends, moderate or intense contact | Poorer well-being, strongest among girls and less-affluent teens |
Impact
Short-term: The study gives parents, teachers and young people a more specific way to talk about screen use, focusing on who teens talk to online and not only on screen time.
Long-term: If later research that follows the same teenagers over time confirms the pattern, school well-being programmes and online safety guidance could pay closer attention to online-only relationships, especially for girls and young people from poorer homes.
Who is affected: Teenagers and young adults who socialise online, their parents and teachers, school counsellors, and those who design online safety and digital well-being programmes.
Key Takeaway
A Stockholm University study of 3,034 15-year-olds, published on 4 November 2026, links online chats with close friends to better well-being and frequent contact with online-only friends to poorer well-being.
Questions and Answers
Is online communication bad for teenagers' mental health, according to this study?
Not as a whole. The Stockholm University study found that intense online contact with close friends and larger friend groups was linked to better mental well-being, while frequent contact with friends known only online was linked to poorer well-being.
Who was most affected by online-only friendships?
The negative link was strongest among girls and among adolescents who saw their families as less wealthy.
How many teenagers were studied and where?
The researchers analysed answers from 3,034 15-year-olds in Sweden, collected in the Health Behaviour in School-aged Children surveys of 2017/2018 and 2021/2022.
Does the study prove that online-only friends harm teenagers?
No. It is a cross-sectional study, so it shows associations at one point in time. It cannot show whether online-only friendships cause poorer well-being or whether teens who already feel low turn to them.
Disclaimer: Prepared by the Peepals newsroom from publicly available sources with AI assistance. Information is accurate to the best of our knowledge at the time of publication and may change. Images may be representative. Not professional advice. Report an error via our contact page.
By Kabir Sethi, Education CorrespondentCovers Education and more for Peepals Yuva. All stories by Kabir Sethi
MPSC Group C 2026: posts rise to 16,717, apply from November 13
PUBG Mobile Flash launches November 13; India gets BGMI Air beta instead
Get the day's stories in your inbox
Peepals Weekly: the week decoded, free. One email a week, unsubscribe in one click.
Kabir Sethi is a pen name of the Peepals Global Editorial Team, which researches, fact-checks and publishes every story. The portrait is an illustration.









